The CEO of Face of Beauty, Patience Egbor, accused her ex-husband, Mr. Peter, of being responsible for her setbacks and leaving their children. Mr. Peter, responding indirectly through a proxy, didn’t confirm or deny the allegations. He emphasized his commitment to keeping family matters private and defended himself against the accusation of abandonment. Mr. Peter hinted at having evidence to support his stance but chose not to reveal it.
Mr. Peter, the former husband of Patience Egbor, the estranged CEO of Face of Beauty, has released a statement addressing the allegations made against him.
Patience Egbor had previously accused her ex-husband of being responsible for her downfall and abandoning her and their children during a challenging phase in her life. In his response, Mr. Peter neither confirmed nor denied the allegations but stressed his belief in keeping family matters off social media. He specifically addressed the accusation of abandoning their children, asserting that it was untrue.
Get Instantly Update By: Joining Our Whatapps and Telegram Channel
Mr. Peter’s statement, conveyed via a proxy, underlined his dedication to safeguarding the privacy and dignity of his family, especially their children. He made it clear that he would not participate in online disputes, stating, “At the end of the day, I’ll never be seen engaging in online conflicts with an ex I was once married to. I have too much respect for my children and for the sanctity of the marriage that brought them into this world.”
Moreover, he encouraged prudence and discretion, discouraging the public from passing judgment solely based on one side of the story. Mr. Peter expressed his worry about the potential repercussions on their children and reaffirmed his commitment to shielding them from public scrutiny.
Mr. Peter alluded to having evidence to support his stance but made it clear that he had no intention of revealing it to the public. He concluded by expressing gratitude to those who have stood by him and reaffirmed his unwavering dedication to his children.
He wrote;
“At the end of the day, I’ll never been seen doing online dragging with an ex i was once married to. I have too much respect for my children and for the union of wedlock that brought them into this earth.
So for these reasons. I will not tarnish, debunk, or try to defend anything to any online in-laws that weren’t there during the course of a 5 year marriage where lots of events transpired indoors to now know better because of a one sided story being put out. Logically there’s always two sides to every story.
The Internet never forgets and my kids will never grow up to see me dragging the mom online to gain sympathy that I didn’t ask for. I’ll only strongly advise you to refrain from saying I abandoned my kids, leaving a relationship that failed due to lots of reasons best known to the participants of the relationship doesn’t mean I abandoned you or my kids and you know I have endless receipts for that, which will never be published.
The protection and covering of my kids comes first before anything else even above my own self. So kindly refrain from putting my kids out there for online vultures, you know their daddy never abandoned them. Thanks.”
See below;
